Print

[yoqui]

During the voting choice give an option to make the game last max 2 or 3 hrs. I'm sure nobody wants to be playing the same game for 3+ hours. would also better prevent the game from stalling

Whoever has the most cities by that time wins

Well u could always add the unlimited time options, but doubt that would win the majority vote

[Fallen-God]

Not a bad suggestion, might put that in.

Thanks

[applecheese]

great suggestion ! I support.

I might even start playing RNG FFA again if thats added totally ( after 3hours, win for most cities)

[Mul_Daya]

Do iiiiit Fallen, if you really want a game to last over 2 hours there's something wrong with you.

[Fallen-God]

What should the options be?
At the moment it is "One hour", "Two Hours", "No time limit".

That good, or is there something better?

[tgfilsdechienne]

In my opinion: "2hours", "3hours", "no time limit". 1 hour is too short in ffa.

[betterDayz]

sudden death: every unit deals double damage

everybody should vote this option for it to activate, and you can vote each half hour after the 1st hour of game

only players alive can vote (and you can add minimum city requeriment)

PS: -votess is bugged and sometimes doesnt work, so fixing it would help too.

[BurnNBarry]

"90 minutes" "120 minutes" "150 minutes" "180 minutes" "No Time Limit"

After the time limit is over, all income stops and a timer for 10-20 minutes goes up.

You can also replace the word minutes/hours with rounds.

[yoqui]

even though i suggested this i do see some problems like the average game time might go up because people will just wait until the very few last minutes to make a move, but we'll c how this goes during the pro-game. i also think its gonna make a few complainers as the end of the pro game is going to come down to luck

[Mul_Daya]

I like Barry's idea, do iiiit ^^

[BurnNBarry]

even though i suggested this i do see some problems like the average game time might go up because people will just wait until the very few last minutes to make a move, but we'll c how this goes during the pro-game. i also think its gonna make a few complainers as the end of the pro game is going to come down to luck

This is true however I feel if anyone really wants to win they will have to make there move way before the near end to be on the safe side. I think it will create people who want to turtle their small advantage but I think if people aren't willing to take the risk and they wait until the end then they don't deserve it because after all it is "risk." I hate the idling and I think this idea will make people have to move, put more pressure which is the right thing. But yet again I don't know, will see.

[deviance]

inb4 bunkering with most cities, REALLY bad idea tbh, especially that only few games lasted past 2 hours, from my ~~450 games like 3 or so

[lownyou]

inb4 bunkering with most cities, REALLY bad idea tbh, especially that only few games lasted past 2 hours, from my ~~450 games like 3 or so

Definitely agree, Offtopic, cut a loss for 1 dc ,
Sigh happenned again, who opens 10+ tabs of youtube, my sisters a moron 

[Mul_Daya]

Maybe an an option of 30 minutes? Damn, a 30 minute game, that could be fun!

[Fallen-God]

I have to say, I kinda agree with Deviancee.
Very, very few of my games last 90 minutes plus. If you are getting it routinely, you are probably playing wrong. :p

We need some more opinions on this.